Friday, January 25, 2008


This was recently forwarded to me, through a long and tangled e-mail chain. I don't have any link to the original - but it's well said.

By Robert Ringer

I recently received an e-mail from Wayne Holt of Houston, TX. It stated, in part:

"I am stunned by the indifference to practical living skills that so many in our society exhibit. How can so many be so wrong for so long, and still the charade continues? It's as if we deliberately dove off a building laughing and were miraculously saved by an awning. At times, I'm tempted to believe we can't fatally harm ourselves even if we try with all our might."

Mr. Holt gives us a lot to think about. I believe the reason so many can be so wrong for so long - without seeing through the charades (plural, not singular) that are served up to them day in and day out - is because conventional wisdom, myths, and fairytales tend to gain strength with age. After all, if something has been around for a long time, it must be true. Right?

Not so fast. What really happens is that when a preposterous tale - or even an outright lie - is repeated often enough, it acquires "legs." Meaning it becomes self-sustaining. And if it attracts enough adherents, it spreads exponentially. This is how dogma evolves into "fact." Through repetition, a lie can be transformed into truth, and often is.

The dictionary defines charade as "a blatant pretense or deception." Which means that most of what we see and hear are charades.

In the 1963 classic film Charade, Regina Lampert (Audrey Hepburn) asks Peter Joshua (Cary Grant) why people lie. Joshua answers, "Usually it's because they want something. They are afraid the truth won't get it for them."

As the Republican and Democratic caucuses so clearly demonstrate, politicians are a great example of relentless purveyors of charades... constantly calling for increases in the "minimum wage" (even though it affects only two percent of the population)... incessantly babbling about Social Security "reform" (even though Social Security is a pyramid scam that is mathematically impossible to "fix")... acting as though they are serious about putting an end to illegal immigration (even though every rational adult recognizes that it is years too late to do anything about it).

What do politicians hope to gain from such charades? The same things they are always after: First, our votes. Second, as a result of our votes, power. Third, adulation. And fourth, the congressional perks that allow them to live like multimillionaires.

How, Mr. Holt wonders, is it possible for the charades to continue? Because just as people get the governments they deserve, they also get the charades they deserve - and want. People love to be deluded. It feels so warm and fuzzy compared to the harshness of reality.

But what about Mr. Holt's speculation that we are somehow immune to the consequences of the self-destructive tendencies so many of us exhibit? Would that it were so, but the evidence suggests that we irreversibly damage ourselves all the time. In case you hadn't noticed, the Greek and Roman Empires are not around anymore. Neither is the Soviet Union. All of them fell under the weight of their own charades.

It is therefore not surprising that the sun is rapidly setting on Western civilization. We continue to accept the charade that freedom and equality can coexist... The charade that everything in life is relative and that there is no such thing as right and wrong... The charade that the most heinous criminals - even those from other countries who are here illegally - have the same rights as law-abiding citizens.

All noble thoughts, I guess. But, unfortunately, not good for maintaining a civilization. For better or for worse, civilization cannot exist without a generally accepted code of conduct. Sorry, but that's just the way it is.

Make no mistake about it, the resilience of the human race is remarkable. We have survived the Dark Ages, tyrants, slavery, and worse. But I do not agree that there is always an awning to catch us. For example, the six million Jews who bought into the charade that Germany was a safe and cultured nation - and that Adolf Hitler was a harmless nutcase - fell through the awning and landed in the gas chambers.

In closing, I am reminded of the tiniest of all mammals, the shrew, which weighs less than a dime. The shrew is a voracious eater who will not hesitate to devour other shrews. And when it's hungry enough, and there's no other prey around, it is capable of eating itself to death - literally - beginning with its own tail.

I believe that if a person tries hard enough, like the shrew, he can fatally harm himself. Man, of course, does not engage in self-cannibalism. Instead, he relies on the charade. Kind of analogous to a person who commits suicide by forcing the police to kill him.

I say forget about relying on the awning to save you. Focus, instead, on trying not to fall. And a good way to do that is to monitor your personal reality so you avoid buying into too many charades. If you are too wrong too often, for too long - if you continue to buy into the charades promulgated by government, Madison Avenue, and the media - sooner or later, the awning won't be there to catch you.


  1. The reason the minimum wage is important is that it indirectly affects many more people than it allegedly benefits. By preventing unskilled workers from selling their services below a certain level, trade union bosses can demand proportionally higher wages for their skilled members.

    Suppose you have a job that an unskilled worker can do in three hours, but a skilled worker can do in one. If the minimum wage is $7, the union can still underbid it (by a dollar per unit production) with a contract at $20.

    The union gets higher wages for its members, and the unskilled worker is unemployed. Isn't it great that he has the government looking out for him?

  2. Ummmm, Monster,
    Wrong post.
    Welcome aboard, D!
    Since I live in Houston, I'll have to look up Mr. Holt; if he's not just another charade.
    I still believe that a plain spoken politician, saying the thing we all know to be true but dare not say for fear of being labeled, could wipe the floor with any of the euphemism spouters of today.

  3. Daddy, I agree. He'd have to be careful - he can point out the real problems we face only if he can propose a plausible solution. But I think we have 2 pols in this race that are willing to do that - Romney and Rudy. Rudy was VERY unpopular in NY for doing just that, taking on the awful status quo and saying "We don't have to live like this." I had to do some work in NY in the 80's, we were warned not to go through Times Square. Now it's about as safe as Disneyland. Every porn broker, pimp and drug dealer screamed bloody murder when they got the boot.

    Rudy got the mob out of the Fulton Fish Market. Nobody thought that was possible.

    Romney didn't do THAT much as Gov., but his success with Bain is legendary. You don't build large businesses by ignoring the truth.

    McCain, Obama and Clinton - have never been executives. Senators CAN speak in platitudes for decades and get away with it.


We reserve the right to delete comments, but the failure to delete any particular comment should not be interpreted as an endorsement thereof.

In general, we expect comments to be relevant to the story, or to a prior comment that is relevant; and we expect some minimal level of civility. Defining that line is inherently subjective, so try to stay clear of insulting remarks. If you respond to a comment that is later deleted, we may take your response with it. Deleting your comment isn't a personal knock on you, so don't take it as such.

We allow a variety of ways for commenters to identify themselves; those who choose not to do so should take extra care. Absent any prior context in which they may be understood, ironic comments may be misinterpreted. Once you've earned a reputation for contributing to a conversation, we are likely to be more tolerant in those gray areas, as we'll understand where you're coming from.